Skip to main content
AI

Continuous 'Thought' Machines

A new kind of neural network model that unfolds and uses neural dynamics as a powerful representation for computation.
Dr. Gareth Roberts
May 17, 20258 min read
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Continuous 'Thought' Machines
Introducing the **Continuous Thought Machine (CTM)** - a revolutionary neural network architecture that fundamentally reimagines how artificial neural networks process information by incorporating temporal dynamics at the neuron level.The CTM is built upon three distinctive design principles that set it apart from traditional neural architectures:Unlike conventional neural networks where neurons simply compute weighted sums of inputs, each neuron in a CTM maintains its own **internal clock** and processes a rolling history of pre-activations. This allows individual neurons to:
Track temporal patterns in their input streams
Maintain memory of past activations
Develop specialized temporal behaviors
Rather than being constrained by input sequence length or external timing, CTMs generate their own computational "ticks" that are **independent of input sequence length**. This enables:
Adaptive computation time based on problem complexity
Internal reasoning that can exceed input duration
More natural handling of variable-length sequences
Perhaps most innovatively, CTMs use **neural synchronisation matrices** as their primary latent space, replacing traditional activation vectors. This synchronisation-based representation:
Captures complex relationships between neurons
Provides interpretable insights into internal reasoning
Enables emergent coordination patterns
The CTM architecture introduces several novel components:
A rolling buffer of historical pre-activations
An internal phase oscillator
Adaptive temporal kernels that evolve during training
The synchronisation matrix S(t) captures the phase relationships between all neuron pairs:\
TAGGED WITH
AI
Machine Learning
Neural Networks
Enjoyed this article?Share it with your network

Discussion

3 comments

Join the Discussion

Comments are moderated and will appear after review. Please keep discussions respectful and on-topic.
Dr. Sarah Chen2 days ago
Fascinating analysis of constitutional AI! The point about cultural bias in constitution design is particularly insightful. Have you considered how federated constitutional systems might address some of these challenges?
Like
Alex Morgan1 day ago
Great question! I think federated systems could help, but we'd still need mechanisms to resolve conflicts between different constitutional frameworks.
Dr. Michael Thompson3 days ago
The section on real-world testing is crucial. We've seen too many AI safety measures that work in labs but fail in production. More empirical validation is definitely needed.
Like
Elena Rodriguez4 days ago
This reminds me of the challenges we face in international law - trying to create universal principles while respecting cultural diversity. The parallels are striking.
Like

Want to dive deeper?

Connect with me on LinkedIn or Twitter for more insights on AI safety and research.
© 2026 /gareth/ All rights reserved
Dr. Gareth Roberts - AI Safety Researcher & Cognitive Neuroscientist